TY - JOUR T1 - Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? JO - Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition) T2 - AU - Gostian,Magdalena AU - Loeser,Johannes AU - Bentley,Tanya AU - Wolber,Philipp AU - Schwarz,David AU - Balk,Matthias AU - Gostian,Antoniu-Oreste SN - 18088694 M3 - 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 DO - 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 UR - http://www.bjorl.org/en-analgesia-after-tonsillectomy-with-controlled-articulo-S1808869421001543 AB - ObjectiveTo assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). Methods30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) after TE. Average and maximum pain severities (Numeric Rating Scale – NRS: 0–10) on PODs 1–3, analgesic score, quality of life, patient satisfaction and side effects were defined as outcome measures. ResultsAverage pain severities of the protocol and the PCIA group were of similar magnitude (NRS) (POD1: 4.48 vs. 4.71 [p = 0.68], POD2: 4.75 vs. 4.22 [p = 0.32] and POD3: 4.44 vs. 4.25 [p = 0.71]). Maximum pain intensities on POD1 (p = 0.92), POD2 (p = 0.51) and POD3 (p = 0.36) were also comparable between both groups. Patients with a PCIA consumed significantly more opioids (p = 0.001) without significant more side-effects. ConclusionThe PCIA did not provide a superior pain control compared to oral analgesics. In view of the considerable effort and the high opioid consumption, it cannot be recommended as a standardized application for pain control after TE. ER -