Journal Information
Vol. 85. Issue 1.
Pages 92-98 (January - February 2019)
Visits
4628
Vol. 85. Issue 1.
Pages 92-98 (January - February 2019)
Original article
Open Access
Frequency of GJB2 mutations in patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss from an ethnically characterized Brazilian population
Frequência de mutações de GJB2 em pacientes com perda auditiva não sindrômica em uma população brasileira etnicamente caracterizada
Visits
4628
Felippe Felix
Corresponding author
fefelix@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Marcia Gonçalves Ribeiro, Shiro Tomita, Mariano Gustavo Zalis
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (4)
Table 1. Ethnicity of patients.
Table 2. Ethnicity and presence of GJB2 variants.
Table 3. Profile of participants with sequencing changes.
Table 4. Variants found in the sequencing of the GJB2 gene.
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction

In different parts of the world, mutations in the GJB2 gene are associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss, and the homozygous 35delG mutation (p.Gly12Valfs*2) is a major cause of hereditary hearing loss. However, the 35delG mutation is not equally prevalent across ethnicities, making it important to study other mutations, especially in multiethnic countries such as Brazil.

Objective

This study aimed to identify different mutations in the GJB2 gene in patients with severe to profound nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss of putative genetic origin, and who were negative or heterozygote for the 35delG mutation.

Methods

Observational study that analyzed 100 ethnically characterized Brazilian patients with nonsyndromic severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, who were negative or heterozygote for the 35delG mutation. GJB2 mutations were detected by DNA-based sequencing in this population. Participants’ ethnicities were identified as Latin European, Non-Latin European, Jewish, Native, Turkish, Afro-American, Asian and Others.

Results

Sixteen participants were heterozygote for the 35delG mutation; 14 participants, including three 35delG heterozygote's, had nine different alterations in the GJB2 gene. One variant, p.Ser199Glnfs*9, detected in two participants, was previously unreported. Three variants were pathogenic (p.Trp172*, p.Val167Met, and p.Arg75Trp), two were non-pathogenic (p.Val27Ile and p.Ile196Thr), and three variants were indeterminate (p.Met34Thr, p.Arg127Leu, and p.Lys168Arg). Three cases of compound heterozygosity were detected: p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)];[(Trp172*)], p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)](;)[(Met34Thr)], and p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)(;)[(Ser199Glnfs*9)]).

Conclusion

This study detected previously unclassified variants and one case of previously unreported compound heterozygosity.

Keywords:
Hearing loss
Deafness
Genetics
Resumo
Introdução

Em diferentes partes do mundo, mutações do gene GJB2 estão associadas a perda auditiva não sindrômica e a mutação homozigótica 35delG (p.Gly12Valfs*2) é uma das principais causas de perda auditiva hereditária. No entanto, a mutação 35delG não é igualmente prevalente em todas as etnias, faz com que seja importante estudar outras mutações, especialmente em países multiétnicos, como o Brasil.

Objetivo

Identificar diferentes mutações no gene GJB2 em pacientes com perda auditiva neurossensorial grave ou profunda não sindrômica de origem genética putativa e negativos ou heterozigotos para a mutação 35delG.

Método

Estudo observacional que analisou 100 pacientes brasileiros caracterizados etnicamente, com perda auditiva neurossensorial grave ou profunda não sindrômica, negativos ou heterozigotos para a mutação 35delG. As mutações de GJB2 foram detectadas por sequenciamento baseado no DNA nessa população. As etnias dos participantes foram identificadas como latino-europeia, não latino-europeia, judaica, nativa, turca, negra, asiática e outras.

Resultados

Dezesseis participantes eram heterozigotos para a mutação 35delG e 14, incluindo três heterozigotos para 35delG, apresentaram nove alterações no gene GJB2. Uma variante, p.Ser199Glnfs*9, detectada em dois participantes, não havia sido relatada anteriormente. Três variantes eram patogênicas (p.Trp172*, p.Val167Met, e p.Arg75Trp), duas não patogênicas (p.Val27Ile e p.Ile196Thr) e três indeterminadas (p.Met34Thr, p.Arg127Leu, e p.Lys168Arg). Três casos de heterozigosidade composta foram detectados: p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)];[(Trp172*)], p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)](;)[(Met34Thr)], e p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)(;)[(Ser199Glnfs*9)]).

Conclusão

Este estudo detectou variantes não classificadas anteriormente e um caso de heterozigosidade composta ainda não relatada.

Palavras-chave:
Perda de audição
Surdez
Genética
Full Text
Introduction

Hearing loss has a high socioeconomic impact,1–3 and congenital hearing loss affects about 1/1000 children born in the United States.4 Fifty to sixty percent of these cases have genetic origins5,6 and, of those, close to 70% are nonsyndromic hearing loss.1,7 Mutations in the GJB2 gene encoding the gap junction β-2 protein, connexin 26, are the most common cause of genetic nonsyndromic hearing loss in different parts of the world.8 The most common mutation in the GJB2 gene is 35delG, which, in the homozygous state, usually results in severe to profound hearing loss.9

However, the 35delG mutation is not equally prevalent across ethnicities. Moreover, when this deletion occurs in the heterozygous state, with monoallelic expression, the origin of hearing impairment cannot be directly attributed to this mutation. Thus, the possibility of other mutations being directly associated with hearing loss should be investigated, especially in multiethnic countries such as Brazil.10 DNA-based sequencing of the GJB2 gene may help identify novel mutations associated with hereditary deafness.

This study aimed to identify different mutations in the GJB2 gene in patients with nonsyndromic severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss of putative genetic origin, who were negative or heterozygote for the 35delG mutation. Participating patients received treatment at the Hearing Health Clinic in Otorhinolaryngology Service in a Tertiary University Hospital in Brazil.

Methods

This study was conducted at a Tertiary University Hospital between September 2011 and August 2014, and was approved by the hospital research ethics committee (043/11). The target populations were patients at the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Otorhinolaryngology Service, with nonsyndromic severe to profound sensorineural/mixed deafness of putative genetic origin, who were negative or heterozygote for the 35delG mutation of the GJB2 gene. Patients with nonsyndromic deafness of putative genetic were those whose clinical, audiological, and imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) examination showed no evidence of other known causes of deafness. Patients or legal guardians who did not agree to sign the informed consent form and/or answer the study questions were excluded. All patients were enrolled for the study by the main author.

Participants’ ethnicities were identified by themselves or by their legal guardians as Latin European, Non-Latin European, Jewish, Native, Turkish, Afro-American, Asian, and Others, following the classification of ethnicity of the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC).11 The patient or his/her legal guardian were asked if there were other cases of deafness in the family and for the presence of consanguinity.

Of 530 patients seen at the clinic in this period, 100 fulfilled the criteria for participation in the study. All selected participants, or their legal guardians, freely signed the informed consent forms and underwent blood collection for DNA analysis. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using PureLink™ Genomic DNA kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After amplification and purification, the genomes were sequenced using the ABI Prism Big-Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit™ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and fragments were assembled using the Sequencing Analysis software version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems), and aligned using the CLC Sequence Viewer 6 software (CLCBio, Aarhus, Denmark) and Mutation Surveyor® software (Softgenetics LLC., State College, PA, USA).

The nomenclature for the description of sequence variants was based on the three-letter code for amino acid sequences preceded by “p.”, following the recommendations of the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS). Similarly, compound heterozygous sequence variants were also described according to the HGVS nomenclature recommendations. In the case of the 35delG mutation, we opted to use the nomenclature based on nucleotide sequences because it is widely accepted. However, in the description of compound heterozygous 35delG mutations, we used the nomenclature based on amino acid sequences, i.e., p.(Gly12Valfs*2), to follow the HGVS standard nomenclature.

Pathogenicity was determined using the SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant) and Polyphen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2) analysis tools and available information from the following databases: 1000 genomes Project,12 Connexin-Deafness Homepage,13 and the Deafness Variation Database of the University of Iowa.14

The comparison of the variables between the subgroups with and without GJB2 variants was evaluated by Chi-square test.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 14.8 years (range: 1–59 years) and 51% of participants were male. Among the 100 participants, 84 lacked the 35delG mutation, and the remaining were heterozygous for 35delG.

Table 1 shows the ethnical characterization of the participants, 67% of whom reported European ancestry, while 57% indicated African descent. No participants reported Jewish, Turkish or Asian ethnicities. There was no statistically significant relationship (p=0.35) between different ethnicities evaluated and the presence of variants of the GJB2 gene (Table 2).

Table 1.

Ethnicity of patients.

Ethnicity  N (n=100) 
Latin European  35 
Afro-American/Latin European  29 
Afro-American  23 
Native/Latin European 
Native 
Native/Afro-American 
Non-Latin European 
Afro-American/Non-Latin European 
Table 2.

Ethnicity and presence of GJB2 variants.

EthnicityTotal (n=100)With GJB2 variants (n=14)Without GJB2 variants (n=86)p
n  n  n 
Latin European  35  35.0  21.4  32  37.2   
Afro-American  23  23.0  21.4    23.3   
Afro-American/Latin European  29  29.0  50.0  22  25.6  0.35 
Others  13  13.0  7.1  12  14.0   

Of 37 participants who reported a family history of hearing loss, three had a GJB2 gene variant; five reported consanguinity, of which only one had a GJB2 gene variant. As shown in Table 3, 14 participants had GJB2 gene variants other than 35delG – a total of nine variants – including three patients who were heterozygote for the 35delG mutation. Of these other variants, three are pathogenic, two are non-pathogenic, three are as yet indeterminate, and one is a previously undescribed variant. The characteristics of each variant are described in Table 4.

Table 3.

Profile of participants with sequencing changes.

Case  Variant found  Heterozygous 35delG mutation  Ethnicity  Age (years)  Type of hearing loss 
14  p.(Trp172*)  Yes  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
16  p.[(Val27Ile)(;) [(Arg127Leu)]  No  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
30  p.(Lys168Arg)  No  Latin European  Congenital 
35  p.(Val27Ile)  No  Afro-American  Congenital 
45  p.(Met34Thr)  No  Afro-American  47  Sudden 
48  p.(Ser199Glnfs*9)  no  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
49  p.[(Ile196Thr)(;) [(Lys168Arg)]  No  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
53  p.(Ser199Glnfs*9)  Yes  Latin European  Congenital 
62  p.(Val167Met)  No  Afro-American  Congenital 
64  p.(Lys168Arg)  No  Native/Afro-American  Congenital 
65  p.(Met34Thr)  Yes  Afro-American/Latin European  47  Progressive 
79  p.(Val27Ile)  Yes  Latin European  16  Progressive 
82  p.(Arg75Trp)  No  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
100  p.(Val27Ile)  No  Afro-American/Latin European  Congenital 
Table 4.

Variants found in the sequencing of the GJB2 gene.

Variant found and annotation  Description  Effect  SIFT  Polyphen-2  Source*  Type of variant 
Pathogenic
p.(Trp172*)  Substitution of a guanine by an adenosine at position 516  Substitution of tryptophan by a stop codon at position 172  Not evaluable  Not evaluable  Da Vinci  Non-sense 
p.(Arg75Trp) rs28931 593  Substitution of a cytosine by a thymine at position 223  Substitution of arginine by tryptophan at position 75  0.0  1.0  Da Vinci 1000 genomes Deafness Variation  Missense 
p. (Val167Met) rs11103 3360  Substitution of a guanine by an adenosine at nucleotide position 499  Substitution of valine by methionine at position 167  0.04  0.168  Deafness Variation 1000 genomes (possibly pathogenic)  Missense 
Non-pathogenic
p.(Val27Ile) rs22740 84  Substitution of a guanine by an adenosine at position 79  Substitution of valine by isoleucine at position 27  0.21  1.0  Da Vinci 1000 genomes Deafness Variation  Missense 
p.(Ile196Thr)  Substitution of a cytosine by a thymine at position 587  Substitution of isoleucine by threonine at position 196  0.01  0.922  Benign by Deafness Variation  Missense 
Variant found and annotation  Description  Effect  SIFT  Polyphen-2  Source*  Type of variant 
Indeterminate
p.(Met34Thr) rs35887622  Substitution of a thymine by a cytosine at position 101  Substitution of methionine by threonine at position 34  0.01  0.38  DaVinci 1000 genomes Deafness Variation  Missense 
p.(Lys168Arg) rs2001043 62  Substitution of an adenosine by a guanine at position 503  Substitution da lysine by arginine at position168  0.29  0.074  Benign by 1000 genomes unknown pathogenicity by Deafness Variation  Missense 
p.(Arg127Leu) rs1110331 96  Substitution of a guanine by a thymine at nucleotide position 380  Substitution of arginine by leucine at position 127  0.04  0.277  Pathogenic by Deafness Variation benign by 1000 genomes  Missense 
Undescribed
p.(Ser199Glnfs*9)  Duplication of the CAGTG segment at position 596  Substitution of serine by glutamine at position 199 and insertion of a frame shift and stop codon  Not evaluable  Not evaluable  Undescribed  Frame shift 
Discussion

Of 100 patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, 14 had one or more among nine variants in the GJB2 gene other than 35delG, including three who were heterozygote for 35delG. Three of those mutations are pathogenic, one is a previously unreported variant (p.(Ser199Glnfs*9)), and one is a previously unreported case of compound heterozygosity with 35delG, (p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)(;)[(Ser199Glnfs*9)]).

Several studies in different populations have reported the prevalence of the main GJB2 gene variants in patients with deafness.7,15 Our study is the first to identify GJB2 variants in an ethnically characterized, profoundly hearing impaired sample from a multiethnic Brazilian population. In addition, we detected a previously unclassified variant and one previously unreported case of compound heterozygosity.

Despite the well-known relationship between ethnicity and mutations of the GJB2 gene,8 we did not find a statistically significant relationship between gene changes and ethnicity in the studied group. Apparently, when we split into ethnic groups, the sample size was insufficient to detect significant results.

After 35delG, the p.(Val27Ile) polymorphism was the most prevalent GJB2 variant in the study population, with a frequency of 4.0%. This variant is considered non-pathogenic and has been reported in several studies, both in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.16

The p.(Met34Thr) variant of connexin 26 was first described as dominant pathogenic by Kelsell et al. in 1997.17 Later, those findings were questioned and it was suggested that it might be non-pathogenic.16,18–21 In our study population, we found one case, with profound hearing loss, of p.(Met34Thr) in compound heterozygosity with 35delG, p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)](;)[(Met34Thr)]. This presentation was previously documented: a large multicenter study by Snoeckx et al. (2005)22 found 38 individuals with sensorineural hearing loss who were compound heterozygotes for p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)](;) [(Met34Thr)] and 16 homozygotes for p.(Met34Thr) who also had hearing impairment. Conversely, Feldmann et al. (2004)23 found four normal hearing individuals who were compound heterozygotes for p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)](;)[(Met34Thr)] and characterized this variant as non-pathogenic. The presence of this type of association in normal hearing individuals suggests that this alteration has no pathogenic potential.

One participant in our study had the p.(Trp172*) variant in compound heterozygosity with 35delG (p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)];[(Trp172*)]). The p.(Trp172*) variant, in homozygosity, was first described in a Brazilian individual with bilateral, severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.24 Later, Christiani et al. (2007)25 described a cochlear implant recipient with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who was also a compound heterozygote for p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)];[(Trp172*)], like the participant in our study. We genotyped the parents of the patient in our study, both of whom were normal hearing individuals, and found that one parent was heterozygote for 35delG and the other for p.(Trp172*), indicating that these variants may not be pathogenic in heterozygosity.

To date, the p.(Val167Met) variant was detected only in individuals of African ancestry, and only the homozygous form was described as pathogenic.26–28 In our study, we detected this variant in an Afro-American male participant with congenital deafness, but in heterozygous state. Thus, either the hearing loss of this patient was caused by (unidentified) mutations in a different gene, or p.(Val167Met) is also an autosomal dominant mutation.

We detected the compound heterozygosity p.[(Val27Ile)(;) [(Arg127Leu)] in one of our subjects (n° 16). The p.(Arg127Leu) variant was first described by Tang et al. (2006)29 in a heterozygous state in two normal-hearing subjects, one Asian and one Hispanic. However, the low number of cases of this variant thus far reported prevents a definition regarding its pathogenicity. Thus, the origin of hearing loss in case 16 in our study cannot be attributed to these variants either combined with p.(Val27Ile) or in isolation, and may have originated from alteration in another gene.

The p.(Arg75Trp) variant, found in one of our subjects, was first detected in a case of autosomal dominant hearing loss associated with palmoplantar keratoderma, which was characterized as nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNA3).30 However, p.(Arg75Trp) was later detected as a de novo mutation (no family history of hearing loss) in a child with bilateral profound hearing loss and no skin disorders,31 exactly as in the case detected in our study.

In our study, three alleles were detected with the p.(Lys168Arg) variant: in one case, it was associated with the p.(Ile196Thr) variant, whereas in the other two cases the heterozygous variant was not associated with other variants. Putcha et al. (2007) detected the p.(Lys168Arg) variant at a frequency of 0.3% (7/1796) in hearing impaired patients.6 However, Samanich et al. (2007) detected a heterozygous p.(Lys168Arg) both in patients with sensorineural hearing impairment and in normal hearing controls, and described it as non-pathogenic.28 Variant p.(Ile196Thr), found in one patient in compound heterozygosity with p.(Lys168Arg), is a missense variant that cause changes in the amino acid sequences of the last transmembrane domain of connexin 26, but is described as benign by the Deafness Variation Database.12

Variant p.(Ser199Glnfs*9) is a previously unreported frameshift variant detected in two study participants, in one of them as a previously unreported case of compound heterozygosity with 35delG (p.[(Gly12Valfs*2)(;)[(Ser199Glnfs*9)]). Like p.(Ile196Thr), this variant also changes the amino acid sequences of the last transmembrane domain of connexin 26. None of the two participants with this variant had a family history of deafness or consanguinity. Another variant has been previously detected at position 199, the missense p.(Ser199Phe) variant, which is described as pathogenic in the homozygous state by the Deafness Variation Database.12

Conclusion

The study of gene GJB2 in this multiethnic population demonstrated variants previously undescribed or rarely described. This suggests that a complete evaluation of this gene through gene sequencing, rather than just identifying mutation 35delG, should be the rule. Furthermore, new studies, investigating other genes, such as GJB6, must take place in order to identify the etiology of hearing loss of these patients.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ).

References
[1]
C.W. Cremers, H.A. Marres, P.M. Van Rijn.
Nonsyndromal profound genetic deafness in childhood.
Ann N Y Acad Sci, 630 (1991), pp. 191-196
[2]
V. Kalatzis, C. Petit.
The fundamental and medical impacts of recent progress in research on hereditary hearing loss.
Hum Mol Genet, 7 (1998), pp. 1589-1597
[3]
A. Middleton, J. Hewison, R.F. Mueller.
Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness.
Am J Hum Genet, 63 (1998), pp. 1175-1180
[4]
M.M. Cohen, R.J. Gorlin.
Epidemiology, etiology, and genetic patterns.
Hereditary hearing loss and its syndromes, 1st ed., pp. 9-21
[5]
M.L. Marazita, L.M. Ploughman, B. Rawlings, E. Remington, K.S. Arnos, W.E. Nance.
Genetic epidemiological studies of early-onset deafness in the U.S. school-age population.
Am J Med Genet, 46 (1993), pp. 486-491
[6]
G.V. Putcha, B.A. Bejjani, B. Bleoo, J.K. Booker, J.C. Carey, N. Carson, et al.
A multicenter study of the frequency and distribution of GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in a large North American cohort.
Genet Med, 9 (2007), pp. 413-426
[7]
G. Van Camp, P.J. Willems, R.J. Smith.
Nonsyndromic hearing impairment: unparalleled heterogeneity.
Am J Hum Genet, 60 (1997), pp. 758-764
[8]
P. Gasparini, R. Rabionet, G. Barbujani, S. Melçhionda, M. Petersen, K. Brondun-Nielsen, et al.
High carrier frequency of the 35delG deafness mutation in European populations. Genetic Analysis Consortium of GJB2 35delG.
Eur J Hum Genet, 8 (2000), pp. 19-23
[9]
E.S. Cohn, P.M. Kelley.
Clinical Phenotype and Mutations in Connexin 26 (DFNB1/GJB2), the most common cause of childhood hearing loss.
Am J Med Genet, 89 (1999), pp. 130-136
[10]
Características Étnico-Raciais da População: Classificações e Identidades, 1st ed.,
[11]
E.E. Castilla, I.M. Orioli.
ECLAMC: the Latin-American collaborative study of con genital malformations.
Commun Genet, 7 (2004), pp. 76-94
[12]
Deafness Variation Database. Available in: http://deafnessvariationdatabase.org [accessed in: 10.10.14].
[13]
The Connexin-deafness homepage. Available in: http://davinci.crg.es/deafness [accessed in: 10.10.14].
[14]
1000 Genomes. A Deep Catalog of Human Genetic Variation. Available in: http://browser.1000genomes.org/index.html [accessed in: 20.03.15].
[15]
R. Rabionet, P. Gasparini, X. Estivill.
Molecular genetics of hearing impairment due to mutations in gap junction genes encoding beta connexins.
Hum Mutat, 16 (2000), pp. 90-202
[16]
P.M. Kelley, D.J. Harris, B.C. Comer, J.W. Askew, T. Fowler, S.D. Smith, et al.
Novel mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) that cause autosomal recessive (DFNB1) hearing loss.
Am J Hum Genet, 62 (1998), pp. 792-799
[17]
D.P. Kelsell, J. Dunlop, H.P. Stevens, N.J. Lench, J.N. Liang, G. Parry, et al.
Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness.
Nature, 387 (1997), pp. 80-83
[18]
F. Denoyelle, G. Lina-Granade, H. Plauchu, R. Bruzzone, H. Chaib, F. Levi-Acobas, et al.
Connexin 26 gene linked to a dominant deafness.
Nature, 393 (1998), pp. 319-320
[19]
D.A. Scott, M.L. Kraft, E.M. Stone, V.C. Sheffield, R.J. Smith.
Connexin mutations and hearing loss.
Nature, 391 (1998), pp. 32
[20]
A.J. Griffith.
Genetic analysis of the connexin-26 M34T variant.
J Med Genet, 38 (2001), pp. E24
[21]
A.F. Roux, N. Pallares-Ruiz, A. Vielle, V. Faugere, C. Tremplin, D. Leprevost, et al.
Molecular epidemiology of DFNB1 deafness in France.
BMC Med Genet, 5 (2004), pp. 5
[22]
R.L. Snoeckx, P.L. Huygen, D. Feldmann, S. Marlin, F. Denoyelle, J. Waligora, et al.
GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study.
Am J Hum Genet, 77 (2005), pp. 945-957
[23]
D. Feldmann, F. Denoyelle, N. Loundon, D. Weil, E.N. Garabedian, R. Courdec, et al.
Clinical evidence of the nonpathogenic nature of the M34T variant in the connexin 26 gene.
Eur J Hum Genet, 12 (2004), pp. 279-284
[24]
L.N. Pfeilsticker, G. Stole, E.L. Sartorato, D. Delfino, A.T.M. Guerra.
A investigação genética na surdez hereditária não-sindrômica.
Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol, 70 (2004), pp. 182-186
[25]
T.V. Christiani, F. Alexandrino, C.A. de Oliveira, R.C. Amantini, M.C. Bevilacqua, A.O. Filho, et al.
Molecular study in Brazilian cochlear implant recipients.
Am J Med Genet A, 143A (2007), pp. 1580-1582
[26]
N.M. Gasmelseed, M. Schmidt, M.M. Magzoub, M. Macharia, O.M. Elmustafa, B. Ototo, et al.
Low frequency of deafness-associated GJB2 variants in Kenya and Sudan and novel GJB2 variants.
Hum Mutat, 23 (2004), pp. 206-207
[27]
S.A. Ross, Z. Novak, R.A. Kumbla, K. Zhang, K.B. Fowler, S. Boppana.
GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection.
Pediatr Res, 61 (2007), pp. 687-691
[28]
J. Samanich, C. Lowes, R. Burk, S. Shanske, J. Lu, A. Shanske, et al.
Mutations in GJB2, GJB6, and mitochondrial DNA are rare in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals with hearing impairment.
Am J Med Genet A, 143A (2007), pp. 830-838
[29]
H.Y. Tang, P. Fang, P.A. Ward, E. Schmitt, S. Darilek, S. Manolidis, et al.
DNA sequence analysis of GJB2, encoding connexin 26: observations from a population of hearing impaired cases and variable carrier rates, complex genotypes, and ethnic stratification of alleles among controls.
Am J Med Genet A, 140 (2006), pp. 2401-2415
[30]
G. Richard, T.W. White, L.E. Smith, R.A. Bailey, J.G. Compton, D.L. Paul, et al.
Functional defects of Cx26 resulting from a heterozygous missense mutation in a family with dominant deaf-mutism and palmoplantar keratoderma.
Hum Genet, 103 (1998), pp. 393-399
[31]
A.R. Janecke, D. Nekahm, J. Löffler, A. Hirst-Stadlmann, T. Müller, G. Utermann.
De novo mutation of the connexin 26 gene associated with dominant non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss.
Hum Genet, 108 (2001), pp. 269-270

Please cite this article as: Felix F, Ribeiro MG, Tomita S, Zalis MG. Frequency of GJB2 mutations in patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss from an ethnically characterized Brazilian population. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85:92–8.

Peer Review under the responsibility of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Announcement Nota importante
Articles submitted as of May 1, 2022, which are accepted for publication will be subject to a fee (Article Publishing Charge, APC) payment by the author or research funder to cover the costs associated with publication. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. All manuscripts must be submitted in English.. Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de maio de 2022, que forem aceitos para publicação estarão sujeitos a uma taxa (Article Publishing Charge, APC) a ser paga pelo autor para cobrir os custos associados à publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. Todos os manuscritos devem ser submetidos em inglês.