Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 76, Issue 2, July 2011, Pages 225-232
Brain and Cognition

Perspectives on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The present review summarizes historic and recent research which has investigated the role of the corpus callosum in dichotic processing within the context of audiology. Examination of performance by certain clinical groups, including split brain patients, multiple sclerosis cases, and other types of neurological lesions is included. Maturational, age related, and genetic factors are also discussed. Finally, some attention is given to recent trends in audiology research to develop improved diagnostic and rehabilitation tools for individuals with dichotic deficits potentially related to callosal dysfunction.

Highlights

► The characteristics of the stimuli utilized in clinical testing of dichotic processing can significantly impact patient performance. ► The specific causes of dichotic processing deficits typically encountered in the clinic are varied but are often thought to involve dysfunction of the corpus callosum. ► Assessment and remediation of dichotic processing deficits is an ongoing focus of audiologic research.

Introduction

It is well known that when listening to speech in competition the corpus callosum (CC) plays a critical role in transferring auditory information from one hemisphere to the other. This interhemispheric function has been studied from many perspectives. One of the most common is investigation of dichotic listening which yields the now well known right ear advantage (REA). This REA indicates that in dichotic listening to verbal stimuli the right ear usually outperforms the left ear yielding a modestly higher score. For this reason, it is sometimes referred to clinically as a “left ear deficit”. The underlying mechanism for the REA likely involves the CC and its interaction with the auditory cortices, although attention also certainly plays a role in dichotic laterality and in the modulation of the function of each of the hemispheres (Westerhausen & Hugdahl, 2008).

Much of what has been learned about dichotic listening and the CC has come from subjects who in one manner or another have incurred damage to the CC, and this has permitted the development of certain clinical correlates to dichotic listening performance (Bamiou, Sisodiya et al., 2007, Bamiou, Free et al., 2007, Musiek et al., 1979). To this end, the present review will focus primarily on what we have learned from studying the dichotic performance of subjects who present with a disordered CC. The perspective here will be audiological in that the approach leans toward studies that may provide information of potential clinical application. Specifically, split brain studies will be reviewed followed by other neurological disorders that have been shown to affect the CC and consequently dichotic listening. Maturation, aging, and genetic influences will also be touched upon. While the present review is not intended to be exhaustive, it will provide a level handed perspective and serve as a resource on findings related to dichotic listening measures on compromised CCs.

Section snippets

Dichotic listening performance in the clinic and its relationship to the corpus callosum

Dichotic processing refers to the simultaneous presentation of different acoustic signals, typically speech, to the left and right ears. It is differentiated from diotic processing, in which the same signal is presented to both ears, and monotic processing, in which only a single signal is presented to one ear. Clinically, dichotic listening is generally divided into binaural integration and binaural separation tasks. The former requires that the patient attend to both ears and repeat back what

Split brain patients

Clearly the most definitive studies on dichotic listening and the CC have been those on split brain patients. These patients usually undergo commissurotomy, or section of the cerebral commissures, for control of the spread of intractable seizures. Historically, this surgery received intermittent application from 1940 through the 1960s, notably by neurosurgeon Joseph Bogen. Additional contributions to the understanding of the CC were also made during this time by Roger Sperry and Mike Gazzaniga

Release from competition

Release from central competition measured by dichotic listening is a topic that has occasionally emerged in the literature. Though not a common topic it raises some interesting theoretical if not practical issues. Individuals that have incurred damage to the auditory regions of each hemisphere will generally reveal bilateral deficits on dichotic listening (Baran & Musiek, 1999). If these individuals undergo complete commissurotomy a rather interesting result evolves (see Fig. 5). As expected,

Summary

Dichotic listening for speech stimuli is highly dependent on the CC. The CC has specific anatomical segments related to anatomical regions in each hemisphere. Compromise of the CC from a variety disorders is usually reflected in noteable left ear deficits on dichotic listening tasks. These findings have potentially strong clinical correlations that can be applied. The degree of left ear suppression can be influenced by many factors including stimuli characteristics, hearing sensitivity, and the

References (101)

  • F. Pinheiro et al.

    Dichotic listening tests in students with learning disabilities

    Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

    (2010)
  • R. Rauch et al.

    Analysis of cross-sectional area measurements of the corpus callosum adjusted for brain size in male and female subjects from childhood to adulthood

    Behavioral Bran Research

    (1994)
  • N. Raz et al.

    Trajectories of brain aging in middle aged and older adults: Regional and individual differences

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • L. Rimol et al.

    The effect of voice onset time on dichotic listening with consonant–vowel syllables

    Neuropsychologia

    (2006)
  • S. Springer et al.

    Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy

    Neuropsychologica

    (1978)
  • E. Sullivan et al.

    Quantitative fiber tracking of lateral and interhemispheric white matter systems in normal aging: Relations to timed performance

    Neurobiology of Aging

    (2010)
  • R. Westerhausen et al.

    The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review

    (2008)
  • American Academy of Audiology (2010). Clinical practice guidelines – Diagnosis, treatment, and management of children...
  • American Speech Language Hearing Association (2005). Central auditory processing disorders – Working group on auditory...
  • D. Bamiou et al.

    An unusual case of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy with auditory processing difficulties as the first and sole clinical manifestation

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

    (2004)
  • D. Bamiou et al.

    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

    (2007)
  • D. Bamiou et al.

    Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations

    Annals of Neurology

    (2004)
  • J. Baran et al.

    Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system

  • J. Baran et al.

    Central auditory function following anterior sectioning of the corpus callosum

    Ear & Hearing

    (1986)
  • F. Barkhof et al.

    Functional correlates of callosal atrophy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. A preliminary MRI study

    Journal of Neurology

    (1998)
  • T. Bellis et al.

    Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function

    Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research

    (2001)
  • C. Berlin et al.

    Dichotic processing of speech: Acoustic and phonetic variables

  • C. Berlin et al.

    Central auditory deficits after temporal lobectomy

    Archives of Otolaryngology

    (1972)
  • J. Berrick et al.

    Auditory processing tests for children: Normative and clinical results on the SSW test

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders

    (1984)
  • J. Bissell et al.

    Dichotic listening performance in normal children and adults

    American Journal of Occupational Therapy

    (1984)
  • J. Bloom et al.

    The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: Excitation or inhibition?

    Neuropsychology Review

    (2005)
  • S. Cameron et al.

    The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

    (2008)
  • A. Carter et al.

    Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

    (2001)
  • G. Chermak et al.

    Central auditory processing disorders – New perspectives

    (1997)
  • R. Chmiel et al.

    Unsuccessful use of binaural amplification by an elderly person

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

    (1997)
  • R.M. Cox et al.

    Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients

    Ear & Hearing

    (2011)
  • R. Efron

    The central auditory system and issues related to hemispheric specialization

  • V. Ferrario et al.

    Shape of the human corpus callosum in childhood. Elliptic Fourier analysis on midsagitall magnetic resonance scans

    Investigative Radiology

    (1996)
  • M. Gadea et al.

    Dichotic listening and corpus callosum magnetic resonance imaging in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with emphasis on sex differences

    Neuropsychology

    (2002)
  • S. Gelfand et al.

    Dichotic CV recognition at various interaural temporal onset asynchronies: Effect of age

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1980)
  • L. Gootjes et al.

    Age effects in identifying and localizing dichotic stimuli: A corpus callosum deficit

    Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology

    (2004)
  • R. Greenwald et al.

    Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry on a competing speech task

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

    (2001)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Representation of binaural stimuli by single units in primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1968)
  • Y. Henkin et al.

    The benefits of bilateral versus unilateral amplification for the elderly: Are two always better than one?

    Journal of Basic Clinical Physiological Pharmacology

    (2007)
  • A. Holmes

    Bilateral amplification for the elderly: Are two aids better than one?

    International Journal of Audiology

    (2003)
  • D. Hubel et al.

    The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens

    Journal of Physiology

    (1970)
  • F. Ivone et al.

    Auditory processing maturation in children with and without learning difficulties

    Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica

    (2005)
  • J. Jacobson et al.

    Dichotic paradigms in multiple sclerosis

    Ear & Hearing

    (1983)
  • L. Jancke et al.

    Interhemispheric transfer time and corpus callosum size

    Neuroreport

    (1994)
  • J. Jerger et al.

    Dichotic listening, event related potentials and interhemispheric transfer in the elderly

    Ear & Hearing

    (1995)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Dichotic listening deficits in amblyaudia are characterized by aberrant neural oscillations in auditory cortex

      2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Children with AMB have a range of difficulties in auditory [e.g., poor verbal working memory, speech comprehension (especially in noise), and localization], cognitive (e.g., attention), linguistic (e.g., syntactic impairment), and social processing domains (e.g., poor adaptive and self-esteem skills) (Lamminen and Houlihan, 2015; Moncrieff et al., 2004; Popescu and Polley, 2010; Whitton and Polley, 2011). A unilateral deficit during dichotic listening tasks has long been attributed to callosal dysfunction (Musiek, 1983; Musiek and Weihing, 2011), though later studies have recognized that functional asymmetries along the auditory pathway might provide a basis for the disorder, possibly as low as the brainstem superior olivary complex (Hiscock and Kinsbourne, 2011; Moncrieff et al., 2008; Tollin, 2003). Otitis media, closed-head injuries, and co-morbid disabilities in early childhood may contribute to periods of auditory deprivation that are well known to produce structural and functional abnormalities in the brainstem (Clopton and Silverman, 1977; Coleman and O'Connor, 1979; Moore and Irvine, 1981; Popescu and Polley, 2010; Silverman and Clopton, 1977; Smith et al., 1983; Webster and Webster, 1979) that may lead to AMB. With altered auditory input during development, the brain may recalibrate central auditory circuits to compensate for transient periods of hearing loss from the affected ear(s).

    • Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese: a study in young adults

      2021, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Behavioral tests are among the innumerable possibilities for investigating hearing, providing information about the individual's abilities to process the received auditory information.1–4 Considering that the physiological processes involved in auditory processing are still not fully understood,5 the behavioral assessment is considered a very important tool to help in the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders.6–8 Among the several currently available auditory processing tests,3,9–11 the dichotic listening tests have been widely used, as they provide information on hemispheric and inter-hemispheric functions, since their application allows investigating clinical hearing disorders and conditions that reveal abnormal hemispheric function, involving the abilities of binaural integration and separation, as well as the individuals' attention, memory and executive function impairment.3,4,12,13

    • The influence of oral language environment on auditory development

      2020, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text