Elsevier

Heart Rhythm

Volume 8, Issue 7, July 2011, Pages 1114-1154
Heart Rhythm

News from the Heart Rhythm Society
The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the Perioperative Management of Patients with Implantable Defibrillators, Pacemakers and Arrhythmia Monitors: Facilities and Patient Management: This document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.023Get rights and content

Section snippets

Table of Contents

  • 1

    Preamble

    • 1.1

      Purpose

    • 1.2

      Consensus document definition

    • 1.3

      Appropriate use of this document

  • 2

    Introduction

    • 2.1

      Methods

    • 2.2

      Primary recommended approach

  • 3

    Problems that can occur during medical procedures

    • 3.1

      Summary of Problems that can occur during medical procedures Table 2

    • 3.2

      EMI and CIEDs

      • 3.2.1

        Electrosurgical energy

    • 3.3

      Oversensing

    • 3.4

      Rate responsive algorithms and EMI

    • 3.5

      Reset

    • 3.6

      Pulse generator damage

    • 3.7

      Lead-tissue interface damage

    • 3.8

      Risk mitigation

    • 3.9

      Specific situations

      • 3.9.1

        Cardioversion

      • 3.9.2

        Cardiac ablation for cardiac arrhythmias

      • 3.9.3

        Diagnostic radiation

      • 3.9.4

        Therapeutic

Preamble

The purpose of this document is to provide an expert consensus on the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) during and after surgical or medical procedures. This writing group, appointed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), is a representative group of experts in pacemaker and defibrillator management. Each of the authors is an expert in the management of CIEDs in the setting of medical procedures that might

3.1

Table 2 summarizes the problems that can occur in CIED patients in the perioperative/periprocedural period.

EMI and CIEDs

EMI causing malfunction of pacemakers and defibrillators is well-described.3 The perioperative period is particularly problematic as patients are exposed to a number of energy sources and machinery that may generate EMI and interact with a CIED, ranging from transient effects such as pacing inhibition, inappropriate tracking of electrical noise, damage at the lead-tissue interface, pulse

Preoperative evaluation of a patient with a CIED

Timely, thorough preoperative evaluation is essential for the safe perioperative management of patients with CIEDs and should include a multidisciplinary and systematic approach. The preoperative evaluation presents an opportunity for mutual understanding between the CIED team (cardiologist, cardiac electrophysiologist, device clinic nurses and staff) and the perioperative team (anesthesiologist, surgeon, perioperative assessment team). We assert that the most effective prescription for the

Intraoperative monitoring and considerations

The goal of intraoperative monitoring is to provide a safe environment for the patient with a CIED undergoing a surgical, interventional or diagnostic procedure where interference from EMI is likely to be present. This includes both assuring rhythm stability and protection of the CIED from damage related to the EMI, therefore providing patient safety. See Table 7.

To accomplish this goal requires knowledge of the potential risks to the patient and the CIED, appropriate preparation of the patient

Effect of intraoperative procedures on postoperative functionality of CIEDs

The rationale for postoperative interrogation of devices rests primarily on 1) assuring that the device has not entered a backup safety mode, 2) functionality was not impaired and, 3) restoring preprocedural programming settings if changes were made prior to the procedure. The timing of postoperative assessment depends upon whether EMI exposure was present, the type of CIED, the type of procedure performed and whether preoperative reprogramming was performed. The recommendations for

Future needs

In this document, we have provided recommendations that are based upon the available literature and input from experts in the field: both health care providers and engineer representatives from the companies that manufacture these devices. The limitations to our recommendations are the nature of the literature available, which are chiefly case reports or small patient series, and the changing technology. Without robust scientific data collected prospectively, the approach to these patients will

Acknowledgments

This document would not have been possible without the efforts of HRS staff, and the Scientific and Clinical Documents Committee. The authors also want to express our thanks to the external reviewers from: the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA); the American College of Cardiology (ACC); the American Heart Association (AHA); the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS); the reference group (see Appendix 3); and the United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (99)

  • C. Brooks et al.

    Pacemaker failure associated with therapeutic radiation

    Am J Emerg Med

    (1988)
  • D. Lee et al.

    Use of bipolar power source for transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patient with implanted pacemaker

    Urology

    (2005)
  • A. Cheng et al.

    Effects of surgical and endoscopic electrocautery on modern-day permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (2008)
  • M.J. Rasmussen et al.

    Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be safely used in patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers?

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (1988)
  • R. Iyer et al.

    Management of cardiac pacemaker in a patient with spinal cord stimulator implant

    Pain

    (1998)
  • S.J. Seidman et al.

    In vitro tests reveal sample radiofrequency identification readers inducing clinically significant electromagnetic interference to implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

    Heart Rhythm

    (2010)
  • J.G. Fetter et al.

    Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • A. Jimenez et al.

    Electromagnetic interference between automatic defibrillators and digital and analog cellular telephones [in Spanish]

    Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

    (1998)
  • G.W. Drach et al.

    Treatment of pacemaker patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: experience from 2 continents

    J Urol

    (1990)
  • J.J. Roedig et al.

    Interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator activity during electronic dental device use

    J Am Dent Assoc

    (2010)
  • M.C. Burke et al.

    Management of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators at the time of noncardiac surgery

    ACC Curr J Rev

    (2005)
  • M.J. Rasmussen et al.

    Unintentional deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in health care settings

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2002)
  • B.L. Wilkoff et al.

    HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations

    Heart Rhythm

    (2008)
  • F.A. Aletebi et al.

    Thermal balloon endometrial ablation to treat menorrhagia in high-risk surgical candidates

    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc

    (1999)
  • A. Fieldman et al.

    Phantom pacemaker programming

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1978)
  • M. Niehaus et al.

    Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators

    Heart

    (2001)
  • J. Bayes

    A survey of opthalmic anesthatists on managing pacemakers and implanted cardiac defibrillators

    Anesth Analg

    (2010)
  • P.H. Belott et al.

    Resetting of DDD pacemakers due to EMI

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1984)
  • K.B. Domino et al.

    Electrocautery-induced reprogramming of a pacemaker using a precordial magnet

    Anesth Analg

    (1983)
  • J.F. Godin et al.

    STIMAREC reportPacemaker failures due to electrocautery and external electric shock

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1989)
  • L.I. Heller

    Surgical electrocautery and the runaway pacemaker syndrome

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1990)
  • W. Irnich et al.

    Electromagnetic interference in implantable pacemakers

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1978)
  • I. Lichner et al.

    Radio-frequency hazards with cardiac pacemakers

    Br Med J

    (1965)
  • D. Mangar et al.

    Electrocautery-induced pacemaker malfunction during surgery

    Br J Anaesth

    (1991)
  • D. Pfeiffer et al.

    Pacemaker function during radiofrequency ablation

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1995)
  • R.B. Smith et al.

    Pacemaker malfunction from urethral electrocautery

    JAMA

    (1971)
  • G. Vanerio et al.

    The effects of percutaneous catheter ablation on preexisting permanent pacemakers

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1990)
  • M.R. Epstein et al.

    Long-term performance of bipolar epicardial atrial pacing using an active fixation bipolar endocardial lead

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1998)
  • D. Amar et al.

    The Shaw hemostatic scalpel as an alternative to electrocautery in patients with pacemakers

    Anesthesiology

    (1996)
  • S.L. Pinski et al.

    Interference in implanted cardiac devices, part I

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (2002)
  • K. Ausubel et al.

    The pacemaker syndrome

    An Intern Med

    (1985)
  • S. Furman et al.

    Endless loop tachycardia in an AV universal [DDD] pacemaker

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1982)
  • C.A. Katzenberg et al.

    Pacemaker failure due to radiation therapy

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1982)
  • M. Rozner

    Pacemaker misinformation in the perioperative period: programming around the problem [comment]

    Anesth Analg

    (2004)
  • D.F. Ortega et al.

    Runaway pacemaker: a forgotten phenomenon?

    Europace

    (2005)
  • J.S. Snow et al.

    Implanted devices and electromagnetic interference: case presentations and review [review]

    J Invasive Cardiol

    (1995)
  • M. Fiek et al.

    Application of radiofrequency energy in surgical and interventional procedures: are there interactions with ICDs?

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (2004)
  • D. Babuty et al.

    Inappropriate shocks delivered by implantable cardiac defibrillators during oversensing of activity of diaphagmatic muscle

    Heart

    (1999)
  • D. Casavant et al.

    Aborted implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock during facial electrosurgery

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (280)

    • Management of Pancreatic Duct Stones: Extracorporeal Approach

      2023, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This document was endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society on November 30, 2010, and endorsed by the American Heart Association on December 24, 2010, and by the American College of Cardiology Foundation May 3, 2011.

    Correspondence and reprint requests: Sonja Olson, Heart Rhythm Society, 1400K Street, NW, suite 500, Washington DC 20005. E-mail: [email protected].

    δ

    Representing the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

    #

    Representing the American College of Cardiology.

    !

    Representing the American Heart Association.

    ##

    Representing the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

    View full text