International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Acoustic estimation of voice when incorrect resonance function of the nose takes place
Section snippets
Aim
The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of nasality on the voice quality.
Materials and methods
The study was carried out on 125 patients from the Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Phoniatry and Audiology of Medical University in Lublin.
Due to the kind of abnormality (pathological changes) the group was divided into three subgroups:
- 1.
the first was formed of the patients treated due to allergic rhinitis, 46 patients—36.8% (aged 5–15, averaged 9.96);
- 2.
the second was composed of patients with adenoids, 52 patients—41.6% (aged 6–12, averaged 9.23); and
- 3.
the third one consisted of patients
Results
The performed acoustic tests of voice confirmed statistically significant elevation of Fo, HNR and SNR frequency in the studied group as compared with the control group. As follows from the studies, the higher the nasality index and the ratio of nasal cavity pressure and oral cavity pressure (P) are, the greater value of fundamental frequency (Fo) is observed.
The perceptual voice scale is confirmed by the acoustic analysis of voice. As the group was not uniform, individual subgroups were
Discussion
The measurement of nasal airflow in healthy children and in the children with cleft palate is important and differentiating for speech evaluation. The advantages of acoustic “pharyngometry” are emphasized by Wahlamann [12] as a non-invasive and objective method that monitors the treatment effects. Dalston et al. [3] dealt with aerodynamic characteristics in speech production.
Maureen et al. point out to the necessity of compensating cleft palate by the increase of pressure in the oral cavity [9]
Conclusions
The acoustic analysis of voice indicated pathological values of voice in nasality in children.
Basic frequency and its derivatives are characterized by incorrect values. They indicate glottis hyperfunction.
The acoustic analysis may be an useful method in monitoring treatment and rehabilitation of palatopharyngeal failure.
References (13)
- et al.
Tonsillectomy in children with or at risk for velopharyngeal insufficiency: effect speech
Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
(1995) - et al.
Velopharyngeal insufficiency
Bluestone, Stool, Paediatric Otolaryngology
(1983) - et al.
The aerodynamic characteristics of speech produced by normal speakers and cleft palate speakers with adequate velopharyngeal function
Am. Cleft Palate Assoc. Am. Cleft Palate Craniofac. Assoc.
(1990) Voice problems in children: pathogenesis and diagnosis
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(1999)- et al.
Perceptual evaluation of speech and velopharyngeal function in children with and without cleft palate and the relationship to nasal airflow patterns
Cleft Palate Craniofac. J.
(2002) - et al.
Voice disorders in children
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.
(1995)
Cited by (12)
Effects of maxillary expansion on hearing and voice function in non-cleft lip palate and cleft lip palate patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: a multicentric randomized controlled trial
2021, Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyCitation Excerpt :Jitter percentage (pitch perturbation): representing short-term (cycle-to-cycle) deviation in the fundamental frequency of a signal/deviation from true periodicity of a presumably periodic signal25; Shimmer percentage (amplitude perturbation): representing the variability of the peak-to-peak amplitude between adjacent cycles of vocal fold vibrations26; Harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR; dB): quantifying the amount of additive noise in the voice signal.
Effects of Orthognathic Surgery on Voice Characteristics
2021, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Computer-assisted acoustic analysis can be used to objectively distinguish the pathologic voice abnormalities from a healthy voice.10,11,20 It was reported that the increased F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR values were associated with pathological sounds.11 Because we observed significantly decreased voice parameters after surgeries, it could be argued that orthognathic surgery could also reduce the pathologic sounds of the patients in addition to the correction of dentofacial deformity.
Voice characteristics before versus after mandibular setback surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism using nonlinear dynamics and conventional acoustic analyses
2013, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The reasons for these discrepancies may be the small sample size and inconsistent subjects, problems with the occlusal and skeletal patterns, and improper analyses in many studies. Acoustic analyses such as the F0, jitter, shimmer and SNR are classified by conventional acoustic analysis (D’Antonio et al., 1988; Niedzielska, 2005). Zajac and Linville (1989) and Lewis et al. (1993) reported that cleft palate speakers have larger frequency perturbations (jitter) than their normal counterparts.
Autoregressive decomposition and pole tracking applied to vocal fold nodule signals
2007, Pattern Recognition LettersVoice quality in adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Long-term follow-up after one- or two-stage palate repair
2018, Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalEffect of inhalant allergies on voice quality in women
2018, Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja