Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Oral and maxillofacial surgeryA technique for the treatment of oral–antral fistulas resulting from medication-related osteonecrosis of the maxilla: the combined buccal fat pad flap and radical sinusotomy
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
Between 2008 and 2014, 321 cases of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw were identified and treated and the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The majority of the exposed bone areas were in the mandible (68%) compared with the maxilla (28%). The majority of the exposures in the maxilla were confined to the posterior maxilla.
Twenty-three patients (3 men, 20 women; Table I) who presented with stage III MRONJ and sinusitis chose to
Results
We report a 100% resolution rate related to MRONJ, sinusitis, and OAF (Fig 7A). However, 2 patients developed more bone exposure after retreatment with a bisphosphonate. In both cases, the bone exposure occurred in an adjacent area of the maxilla. In one other patient, OAF recurred because of a failed bone grafting attempt, but resolution of the ONJ was retained. All radiographic studies of the patients showed repneumatization of the treated maxillary sinus.
Discussion
It is estimated that 12 million Americans and another 20 million people worldwide are taking either a bisphosphonate or denosumab. Increasingly, osteonecrosis of the maxilla with sinusitis and OAF have been known to occur as a specific presentation of MRONJ. Oral–antral communications caused by these drugs, concomitant with secondary sinusitis, represents a unique treatment challenge for the oral and maxillofacial surgeon.
The buccal fat pad was originally described as an anatomic structure
Conclusions
The surgical protocol of debridement of necrotic bone, radical sinusotomy, and transposition of buccal fat pad can be used as an effective and predictable technique for the resolution of OAF caused by bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis (Fig 8). However, this protocol does not prevent the development of more exposed bone in the future as a result of continued therapy with these drugs.
References (14)
- et al.
Pedicled buccal fat pad flap as a reliable surgical strategy for the treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2015) - et al.
Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2010) American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2007)What is a “failure” of bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis?
Cleve Clin J Med
(2005)- et al.
Defining the epidemiology of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: prior work and current challenges
Osteoporos Int
(2013) - et al.
Bone remodeling in maxilla, and femur of young dogs
Anat Rec
(2007) - et al.
Periodontal disease and bisphosphonates induced osteonecrosis of the jaws in the rat
J Bone Miner Res
(2011)
Cited by (21)
Is maxillary sinusitis and radiographic maxillary sinus opacification associated with an altered microbiology of MRONJ?
2024, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyCombined approach to treatment of advanced stages of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw patients
2022, Brazilian Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyTreatment and outcome of maxillary sinusitis associated with maxillary medication-related osteonecrosis
2021, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and PathologyCitation Excerpt :On the other hand, Voss et al. [9] and Aljohani et al. [19] reported the effectiveness of surgical procedures, consisting of necrotic bone removal followed by closure with a mucoperiosteal flap, for treatment of maxillary MRONJ with maxillary sinusitis. Furthermore, Aljohani et al. [19] and Melville et al. [20] used buccal fat pad flaps successfully for closure of MRONJ-related oroantral communications. In recent years, ESS has been increasingly as a surgical treatment for maxillary sinusitis.
Inferior-based Nasolabial Flap for the Surgical Treatment of Stage 3 Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Maxilla: A Technical Note
2020, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and PathologyCitation Excerpt :Based on recent retrospective studies, patients with advanced MRONJ should undergo surgical treatment rather than nonsurgical treatment to achieve good long-term results [2,3]. Maxillary sinusitis and oroantral communications associated with stage 3 MRONJ in the maxilla is a severe complication [4,5]. Shortly after surgery used a poorly-vascularized mucoperiosteal flap for wound closure, relapse and disease progression of osteonecrosis were frequently observed in the follow-up period [6,7].
Algorithm for the treatment of oral and peri-oral defects through local flaps
2018, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryPrevalence, initiating factor, and treatment outcome of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—a 4-year prospective study
2018, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Better healing with block resection than with sequestrectomy may be explained by the fact that all infected bone was removed. Even more radical surgical approaches with coverage of sinus communication after surgical removal of necrotic bone, along with the buccal fat pad,26 or, in the mandible, coverage with a myofascial flap27 might have resulted in the higher success rate when combined with block resection. However, in the present study none of the patients with unhealed lesions after surgery was interested in a second surgical intervention.