Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.013Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Evaluation for pediatric auditory brainstem implant (ABI) candidacy includes a thorough neurotologic and neurosurgical consultation, audiologic evaluation including both behavioral and electrophysiologic testing, speech and language consultation, high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography and MRI imaging, and neuropsychological assessment of developmental milestones.

  • Indications for an ABI in infants and children include bilateral cochlea aplasia/hypoplasia, cochlear nerve

Treatment goals and outcomes

The treatment goals for pediatric ABI surgery are (1) safe and successful placement of ABI electrode array through the foramen of Luschka (to bring electrode in close proximity to cochlear nucleus), (2) measurable electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) seen intraoperatively, (3) minimizing surgical complications such as CSF leak and facial nerve injury, (4) habilitation/rehabilitation of deafness with meaningful sound detection on behavioral testing, and (5) avoidance of side

Implant Systems

The ABI system is modular, with both external and internal components that capture, transduce, process, and propagate auditory stimuli into electrical signals to the electrode array, similar to that of the CI. The external components include a microphone, battery, speech processor, and transmitter coil. Acoustic stimuli are processed and transmitted as electronic signals to a receiver-stimulator via an induction coil. The surgically implanted receiver-stimulator then carries these signals to

Surgical approach

Choosing which side to implant is primarily based on anatomic considerations and evidence of any detectable thresholds on behavioral or electrophysiologic testing. If both ears demonstrate no functional hearing, then the side with the most accessible lateral recess and radiographic evidence of a cochlear nerve should be implanted. If both sides are similar audiologically and on radiology, the right ear is chosen based on the hypothesis that speech perception abilities rely more on left-brain

Postoperative management

All pediatric patients are monitored in a dedicated pediatric surgical intensive care unit after ABI surgery with hourly neurologic checks for the first 24 hours. A head CT is ordered on the evening of surgery to confirm stable electrode placement and absence of intracranial bleed or midline shift. Perioperative steroids can reduce edema and can be tapered over the patients’ inpatient admission. In our initial experience with 5 retrosigmoid craniotomies for ABI placement in children, the

Complications associated with pediatric abi surgery

Most of the studies looking at complication rates in ABI surgery have been completed in adults and in the context of vestibular schwannoma excision. Thus, we review these data here as dedicated studies of complications following pediatric surgery are limited. The translabyrinthine approach has been the primary approach for ABI surgery historically. Among 258 patients who underwent vestibular schwannoma resection over a 14-year period, perioperative complications included CSF leak (7.8%),

Recovery and auditory habilitation

As CSF leak is the most common complication seen following retrosigmoid craniotomy for ABI in children, a meticulous multilayer closure and use of firm pressure dressing for 5 to 7 days are crucial. Soft splints over the upper extremities are used to reduce displacement of the pressure dressing in the vigorous child. A formal face-lift wrap can be used to provide durable and stable placement of the mastoid dressing. Hospital stay following ABI surgery has ranged from 2 to 4 days for our first

Outcomes and clinical results in the literature

Dedicated pediatric ABI outcomes are not well described in the literature. Thus, we focus on ABI outcomes in both adults and children, which includes a summary of the few pediatric studies completed to date. ABI outcomes vary depending on the patient population, with nontumor patients typically achieving better outcomes than patients with NF2. ABI users with NF2 can expect auditory sensation, environmental sound awareness, and, occasionally, closed-set word recognition. Rarely, these patients

Future of auditory brainstem implant technology

As described in previous sections, the ABI provides meaningful auditory benefits to patients with severe to profound hearing loss; however, outcomes are highly variable across similar cohorts of patients.2, 27, 35 Further, many ABI users experience side effects, such as facial pain, involuntary motor movement, as well as dizziness, caused by activation of nonauditory neurons.6 A possible explanation for the wide range of audiometric outcomes and side effects may be the nonspecific spread of

Summary

Over the past several decades, there has been tremendous evolution in our understanding of auditory physiology and a deeper appreciation for the measures needed to improve hearing habilitation outcomes in deaf pediatric patients. Although CIs have become a mainstream option to improve hearing, this technology does not provide substantial benefits to individuals with profound hearing loss and small or absent inner ear anatomy. The ABI offers an alternative means of stimulating and activating

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Elliott Kozin, MD and Aaron Remenschneider, MD, MPH at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear for their contributions to this article on pediatric ABI surgery.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (56)

  • V. Colletti et al.

    Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?

    Laryngoscope

    (2005)
  • V. Colletti et al.

    Outcomes in nontumor adults fitted with the auditory brainstem implant: 10 years' experience

    Otol Neurotol

    (2009)
  • L. Colletti et al.

    The development of auditory perception in children after auditory brainstem implantation

    Audiol Neurootol

    (2014)
  • L. Sennaroglu et al.

    Preliminary results of auditory brainstem implantation in prelingually deaf children with inner ear malformations including severe stenosis of the cochlear aperture and aplasia of the cochlear nerve

    Otol Neurotol

    (2009)
  • V. Colletti et al.

    Complications in auditory brainstem implant surgery in adults and children

    Otol Neurotol

    (2010)
  • E.G. St. Clair et al.

    Auditory brainstem implants

  • S.R. Otto et al.

    Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant

    Otol Neurotol

    (2008)
  • A. Samii et al.

    Auditory midbrain implant: a combined approach for vestibular schwannoma surgery and device implantation

    Otol Neurotol

    (2007)
  • K.S. Noij et al.

    Direct parasagittal magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory canal to determine cochlear or auditory brainstem implant candidacy in children

    Laryngoscope

    (2015)
  • S.R. Plotkin et al.

    Hearing improvement after bevacizumab in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • L. Sennaroglu et al.

    Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement

    Otol Neurotol

    (2011)
  • A.H. Kim et al.

    Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations

    Otol Neurotol

    (2008)
  • Y.S. Sininger et al.

    Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization

    Science

    (2004)
  • S.V. Puram et al.

    Auditory brainstem implantation in a 16-month-old boy with cochlear hypoplasia

    Otol Neurotol

    (2015)
  • R. Quester et al.

    Topographic anatomy of the cochlear nuclear region at the floor of the fourth ventricle in humans

    J Neurosurg

    (1999)
  • D.R. Friedland et al.

    Evaluation of surgical approaches to endoscopic auditory brainstem implantation

    Laryngoscope

    (1999)
  • S.C. Mass et al.

    Complications of the translabyrinthine approach for the removal of acoustic neuromas

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (1999)
  • S. Charalampakis et al.

    Post-operative complications after removal of sporadic vestibular schwannoma via retrosigmoid-suboccipital approach: current diagnosis and management

    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    Disclosures/conflict of interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

    View full text