Journal Information
Vol. 71. Issue 2.
Pages 168-171 (March - April 2005)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
4511
Vol. 71. Issue 2.
Pages 168-171 (March - April 2005)
Original Article
Open Access
Role of rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus in patients with pharyngotonsillitis
Visits
4511
Bernardo Cunha Araujo Filho1,
Corresponding author
bcaf@terra.com.br

Address correspondence to: Rua Oscar Freire 1799 ap. 1101 Sao Paulo SP 05409-011
, Rui Imamura2, Luiz Ubirajara Sennes3, Flávio Akira Sakae4
1 Otorhinolaryngologist (residence program, HCFMUSP), Specialist in ORL, SBORL (Ph.D. studies under course, Division of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, HCFMUSP)
2 Assistant Physician, Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (Assistant Physician, Ph.D., Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo)
3 Full Professor, Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (Full Professor, Discipline of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo)
4 Otorhinolaryngologist (residence program, HCFMUSP), Specialist in Otorhinolaryngology, SBORL (Ph.D. studies under course, Division of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo). Study conducted at the Division of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
Chart 1. Criteria for inclusion and exclusion in the study.
Table 1. Comparison of rapid test with culture for the detection of GAS antigen in 81 patients with pharyngotonsillitis.
Show moreShow less
Summary

Group A β -hemolytic streptococcus (GAS) is an important pharyngotonsillitis etiologic agent. Correct etiologic diagnosis and early treatment prevent suppurative and non-suppurative complications of streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis; however, clinical diagnosis is not reliable. Within this context, rapid detection methods of GAS antigen are useful to diagnose this agent.

Aim

The objective of the present study was to determine sensitivity and specificity of rapid GAS antigen detection tests used in Brazil.

Study design

Clinical prospective. Method: Eighty-one patients with clinical diagnosis of acute pharyngotonsillitis seen at the otorhinolaryngology emergency department of the University Hospital, FMUSP, between May 2001 and April 2002 were submitted to two simultaneous collections of oropharyngeal material using swabs. The rapid GAS antigen detection test was compared to culture on blood agar, the gold standard for the diagnosis of this etiologic agent.

Results

Among the 81 patients studied, the rapid test was positive in 56% and negative in 44%. GAS growth in culture was observed in 40.7% of the patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test were, respectively, 93.9% and 68.7%, and the negative and positive predictive values were 94.2 and 67.4%, respectively. Conclusions: We concluded that high sensitivity of the test allows its use in the identification of patients with GAS. Rapid streptococcal antigen detection tests have been shown to be an important adjuvant tool in the etiologic diagnosis of pharyngotonsillitis.

Key words:
rapid antigen detection test
group A pyogenes streptococcus
pharyngotonsillitis
Full Text
INTRODUCTION

Pharyngotonsillitis (PT) caused by group A β -hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) is a common affection in Brazil, affecting mainly children and young adults. GAS infection is the main bacterial etiology of acute PT, affecting 15 to 30% of all cases in children and adolescents and 5 to 10% of the cases in adults1–3.

PT may be caused by viral or bacterial infections, but in rare exceptions (Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae) only infections caused by GAS have formal indication of treatment with antibiotics4,5. In such cases, treatment with antibiotics shortens symptoms related with infection (if used within 48 hours after onset of symptoms), it may avoid suppurative and non-suppurative complications and prevent dissemination to the community2,6–10. Rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis, followed by suppurative complications (abscesses, bacteremia, endocarditis) are the most feared complications11.

Given that most acute PT are caused by other agents, virus for example, they do not require treatment with antibiotics. It is extremely important for clinicians and otorhinolaryngologists to be capable of ruling out streptococcus PT, preventing inappropriate use of antibiotics in non-streptococcus PT, exposing patients to unnecessary expenses and the inherit risks of antibiotic use, in addition to increased bacterial resistance7,9.

In the USA, 70% of PT are treated with antibiotics4,5, and it is believed that in Brazil there is higher volume of PT treated this way.

As a result of variability of clinical presentations of streptococcus PT and the large number of agents capable of producing similar clinical presentation, clinical diagnosis of PT caused by GAS is not always reliable10,12. Thus, the physician has to make use of some laboratory methods in an attempt to conclude etiological diagnosis. In the 80's, the market received some rapid antigen detection tests for GAS to have it diagnosed within few minutes. They are easy to handle and interpret tests, which can be used in medical offices7,8. Thus, rapid test may support the etiological diagnosis and treatment of streptococcus pharyngotonsillitis. New techniques for rapid GAS antigen detection have been developed to make them more sensitive, cheaper and easier to use10; however, the experience of its use in public healthcare centers, in which it takes greater importance owing to social -economic reasons, is still limited.

The authors aimed at assessing sensitivity and specificity of rapid GAS antigen detection tests comparing them to the results of culture to define the role they have on daily practice of Otorhinolaryngologists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively studied 81 patients with clinical diagnosis of PT seen in the Emergency Room of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, between May 2001 and April 2002, who were selected to the study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (Chart 1). Fifty-five (67%) were men and sixty-six (33%) were women. Mean age was 39.4 years, ranging from 18 to 69 years.

Chart 1.

Criteria for inclusion and exclusion in the study.

Inclusion:
  • 1.

    Men and women aged 18 or older.

  • 2.

    Patients with clinical diagnosis of pharyngotonsillitis evidenced by:

    • Presence of at least two symptoms:

      • Sore throat

      • Odynophagia

      • History of fever

    • Presence of at least two signs:

      • Erythema and pharynx or tonsil edema

      • Uvular edema

      • Pharyngotonsillar exudate

      • Painful anterior neck ganglions

      • Temperature > 38º C

      • Leukocytes > 12000/mm

 
Exclusion:
  • 1.

    Presence of the following symptoms:

    • Cough

    • Acute rhinorrhea

  • 2.

    History of treatment with antibiotics for the past two weeks

 

For all patients, we collected two simultaneous swabs (Culturette; Becton Dickinson, Maryland) from the posterior wall of the oropharynx and tonsils by the same team of Otorhinolaryngologists. The first swab was taken to the laboratory and it was inoculated in sheep agar-blood plates at 5% for 24-48 hours, following conventional biochemical methods and confirmed by identification of automated system Untek Systems (Biomeniux, USA). The other swab was tested with rapid test, using the optical immune system Strep A OIA Max, within 5 minutes, according to manufacturers' instructions (International Microbio, USA). The laboratory technician did not know the results of rapid test. Any growth of Streptococcus pyogenes on the culture plate was considered a positive culture.

The results of the rapid test were compared with the results of the culture and sensitivity and specificity of the kit Strep A OIA Max were determined; laboratory culture was considered the gold standard method.

RESULTS

A total of 81 oropharynx swabs were analyzed. Out of the total swabs, 46 (56%) were positive for rapid test and 35 (44%) were negative. Thirty-three (40.7%) of the patients had positive culture for Streptococcus pyogenes (Table 1). There were 2 false-negative results. Sensitivity of the rapid test was 93.9% (31 out of 33), specificity was 68.7% (33 out of 48), positive predictive value was 67.4% (31 out of 46) and negative predictive value was 94.2% (33 out of 35). Out of 5 positive cultures for other groups of Streptococcus ²-hemolytic, only one (group C Streptococcus) presented positive rapid test.

Table 1.

Comparison of rapid test with culture for the detection of GAS antigen in 81 patients with pharyngotonsillitis.

METHOD  CULTURETotal 
  Positive  Negative   
Rapid Test IOA       
positive  31  15  46 
negative  02  33  35 
Total  33  48  81 

Forty-five patients (55.5%) presented culture with presence of other bacteria.

DISCUSSION

Similarly to Mayes et al.7, we used swabs for collection of sample of oropharynx bacteria obtaining positive results in almost all cultures. Out of 81 patients included in the study, 78 (96.2%) had bacterial growth in the culture, and 40.7% were positive for GAS, leading us to believe that the inclusion and exclusion criteria adopted were appropriate and indicative of bacterial pharyngotonsillitis, despite the fact that it could also correspond to healthy subjects and/or false-positives. In patients with negative culture for GAS, there was higher prevalence of saprophyte oropharyngeal bacteria.

We decided to use agar-blood culture medium in aerobe environment considering that studies developed comparing different culture methods showed that inoculation in this medium is as good as other more selective methods8,9,13. Agar-blood culture is the exam of preference for diagnosis of GAS, with sensitivity of 90 to 95%6,7,12. False-negative cultures are probably results of patients with small number of colonies, and many are holders. However, this exam may delay the recognition of streptococcus PT in 48 to 72 hours, preventing early diagnosis and antibiotic therapy would lose its value to abbreviate the symptoms of PT and reduce transmissions of GAS to other subjects14.

The prevalence of Streptococcus pyogenes in the studied literature comprised about 25% of all episodes of acute pharyngotonsillitis7–10. According to Bisno et al., 5% to 10% of acute PT in adults have GAS as pathological agents, but we found 40.7% in our sample, which surprised us for two reasons: first because the prevalence of this agent in developing countries such as Brazil is markedly higher, owing to factors related with poor basic sanitation and deficient healthcare systems10, and secondly because the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selective for GAS.

The criteria were used in an attempt to select streptococcus PT, based on the criteria proposed by Centor (pharyngotonsillitis exudate, history of fever, neck lymphoadenopathy, and absence of cough). According to some authors, Centor criteria are the most reliable predictive clinical factors for diagnosis of PT caused by SGA4. It presented positive predictive value of 56% when meeting the four criteria, especially when applied in regions where the prevalence is high4,5, which was confirmed in our study. However, the use only of clinical criteria for diagnosis would lead to unnecessary treatment in many patients.

Kit Strep OIA Max proved to be quick, practical and easy to use and interpret.

Sensitivity of rapid detection test in the literature ranged from 77% to 97%8. The great variability of sensitivity demonstrated by different authors may be resultant from some biases, such as knowledge of rapid test result during colony count of the culture, the selected culture methods, and inexperience of technicians8,10. We found high sensitivity (93.9%), but less than proposed by Kellogg and Mozella13.

Specificity of 68.7% proved to be compatible with that of other studies, which related variability of 54% to 100%9. The increase in sample size could have contributed to improve this parameter. According to Hendley et al., studies sponsored by manufacturers of rapid test produced better results8. Similarly to that author's, our study was not sponsored by any company.

Pichichero et al. obtained only 2.4% of false-negative results, suggesting that rapid test would replace the culture for the diagnosis of infection by GAS7. The presence of two false-positive results (6%) in our study may have resulted from the small amount of antigen in the oropharynx. Even though the tests were negative, we observed slow bacterial growth in the culture. These cases can be explained by the low number of colonies that are detected only by culture8,10. It may also occur in GAS holders without clinical disease, or when there is antigen block by anti-streptococcus antibody in the organism13. Moreover, inappropriate collection of material can also result in false-negative results8,13.

False-positive results are more frequent, presented in 15 cases (32.6%), probably owing to rapid test method failure8, detecting non-specific bacterial antigens or owing to cross reaction with other groups of Streptococcus, such as in one of the cases (group C Streptococcus). Use of oral antiseptics may also generate false-positive results, because they prevent appropriate growth of organisms in the culture medium4,8, but this possibility was not assessed in our study.

Negative predictive value of rapid test was 94.2% and it draws our attention to the fact that 6% of the negative tests were positive cultures. However, this is a small fraction of the population and complications would be rare, especially among adults, in the studied population, in which development of rheumatic fever is exceptional. This great sensitivity of rapid test would prevent patients from being submitted to culture, being treated with antibiotics based on positive test. Conversely, there are authors that advocate the conduction of culture in all patients with negative rapid test to minimize the risk of complications7,12.

CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) in USA recommends treatment of all cases of PT by GAS. Cooper et al. suggested that in USA cultures should not be recommended as initial assessment method for patients with PT or for confirmation of negative results in rapid tests, when they clearly have sensitivity higher than 80%4. The need to assess sensitivity of the test in the Brazilian population and the unique profile of streptococcus PT in Brazil motivated the conduction of the present study.

We understand that the rapid test with negative result, considering it sensitivity, does not require further culture or treatment with antibiotics, once it is a very reliable method. In positive tests, it is worthwhile to manage the case with antibiotics. However, positive predictive value of 67.4% demonstrated that approximately 30% of the cases would be treated unnecessarily. Given the fact that we have high prevalence of GAS in our country, this is an extremely favorable result to the use of rapid GAS detection kit in Brazil. There is currently no study on cost-benefit ratio of the use of rapid tests. However, in the USA, despite the high cost of rapid test compared to culture, there are significant savings in prevention of indiscriminate use of antibiotics and additional visits to the doctor owing to side effects of these antibiotics7,9.

CLOSING REMARKS

Streptococcus pyogenes is the most prevalent organism in bacterial pharyngotonsillitis in our country.

Rapid streptococcus antigen test proved to be an important tool in diagnosis of pharyngotonsillitis owing to its high sensitivity. Thus, negative results point towards absence of streptococcus PT to be treated symptomatically, whereas positive results point towards diagnosis of streptococcus PT, which require antibiotics for its treatment.

We believe that new studies shall be conducted to determine cost-benefit ratio of these kits for detection and their impact on savings of healthcare services.

REFERENCES
[1]
Mayes T , Pichichero M. .
Are Follow-up Throat Cultures Necessary When Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Are Negative For Group A Streptococci.
Clin Pediatr, 40 (2001), pp. 191-195
[2]
Hendley JO , Woods WA , et al.
Optical Immunoassay For Rapid Detection Of Group A B Hemolitic Streptococci..
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 150 (1996), pp. 245-248
[3]
Crousaz H , Laubscher B. .
Evaluation of a New Test Kit for Rapid Detection of A Group A Streptococci, the Abbott test pack Strep A Plus..
Journal Clinical Microbiology, (1995 Jan), pp. 260-261
[4]
Poisson R , Meier FA , Johnson J. .
Effects of a Rapid Antigen Test For Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis on Physician Prescribing and Antibiotic Costs..
Arch Intern Med, 150 (1990), pp. 1696-1700
[5]
Kaplan EL. .
The Rapid Identification of Group A Beta Hemolytic Streptococci in Upper Respiratory Tract..
Pediatrics Clinics of North America, 35 (1988), pp. 535-542
[6]
Cohen ML , Redd SC. .
Rapid Group A Streptococcal Antigen Detection Kit: Effect on Antimicrobial Therapy for Acute Pharyngitis..
Pediatrics, 82 (1988), pp. 576-581
[7]
Clarke A , Kelly MT , et al.
Outpatient Evaluation Of a Rapid Test Detection Of Group A Streptococci in Throat Swabs..
Am J Clin Pathol, 87 (1987), pp. 522-525
[8]
Darrow DH , Siemens C. .
Indications for Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy..
Laryngoscope, 112 (2002), pp. 6-10
[9]
Brook I. .
Antibacterial Therapy for Acute Group A Streptococcal Pharyngotonsillitis: Short-Course versus Traditional 10-Day Oral Regimens..
Pediatrics Drugs, 4 (2002), pp. 747-754
[10]
Cooper RJ , Hoffman JR , Bartlett JG , Besser RE , Gonzales R , Hickner JM. .
Principles of Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Acute Pharyngitis in Adults: Background..
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 37 (2001), pp. 711-719
[11]
Bisno AL , Peter GS , Kaplan EL. .
Diagnosis of Strep Throat in Adults: Are Clinical Criteria Really Good Enough.
Clinical Infectious Disease, 35 (2002), pp. 126-129
[12]
Bisno AL , Gerber MA , Gwaltney JM , Kaplan EL , Schwartz RH. .
Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: A Practice Guideline..
Clinical Infectious Disease, 25 (1997), pp. 574-583
[13]
Bisno AL. .
Acute Pharyngitis..
New England Journal of Medicine, 344 (2001), pp. 205-211
[14]
Centor RM , Witherspoon JM , Dalton HP , Brody CE. .
The Diagnosis of Strep Throat in Adults in the Emergency Room..
Med Decis Making, 1 (1981), pp. 239-246

Study conducted at the Division of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo.

Presented at 36º Congresso Brasileiro de Otorrinolaringologia, in November 2002- Florianópolis-SC.

Article submited on March 09, 2005. Article accepted on April 05, 2005.

Copyright © 2005. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Announcement Nota importante
Articles submitted as of May 1, 2022, which are accepted for publication will be subject to a fee (Article Publishing Charge, APC) payment by the author or research funder to cover the costs associated with publication. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. All manuscripts must be submitted in English.. Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de maio de 2022, que forem aceitos para publicação estarão sujeitos a uma taxa (Article Publishing Charge, APC) a ser paga pelo autor para cobrir os custos associados à publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. Todos os manuscritos devem ser submetidos em inglês.