Otitis media with effusion (OME) is defined as middle ear effusion without signs and symptoms of acute inflammation found in acute otitis media.1 The pathophysiology of the disease is multifactorial, including allergy, autoimmunity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bacteria, viral and eustachian tube dysfunction. From ears with chronic OME, Haemophilus influenzae was the single most common pathogen, and other common bacteria included Streptococcus pneumonia and Moraxella catarrhalis. Other bacteria account for a small percentage of cases.2 Recent studies have investigated the possibility of a relationship between OME and the presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in the middle ear.3 By the age of 10 years approximately 75% of children are infected with H. pylori. Many body regions other than the gastrointestinal tract have been investigated for the presence of this microorganism. In recent years, H. pylori has been found in adenoid tissue, nasal polyp tissue and the middle ear.4H. pylori has also been shown to be present in high ratios in nasal polyps, laryngeal samples, and vocal cord lesions using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.5,6 One potential cause of OME is the reflux of gastric contents into the region of the nasopharyngeal mucosa, which initiates an inflammatory process.7 This pathophysiological mechanism has been frequently questioned in recent study.8,9 Animal studies have shown that reflux leads to eustachian tube dysfunction. The eustachian tube is immature and its angle is wider in children. Therefore gastric contents can more easily reach the middle ear and induce an inflammatory process.10 Few studies have investigated the relationship between OME, pepsinogen levels and H. pylori presence separately.11 Several methods are used for the detection of H. pylori. It has been shown that PCR method has almost 100% sensitivity and specificity in the detection, identification and quantitation of H. pylori in biological samples.12 The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of H. pylori in adenoid tissue of patients with adenoid hyperplasia without OME in comparison with patients who have adenoid hyperplasia with OME.

Our study is a case–control study that was performed on 50 children between the ages 2 and 7 years old with adenoid hyperplasia, with median age of 4.5 years, who were admitted to the ENT department of Shafa hospital (Kerman, Iran) between October 2013 and March 2015. The patients were enrolled in the study by non-random easy sampling method.

Inclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of adenoid hyperplasia that were confirmed by lateral neck radiography in the extension position. The patients have been divided into two groups of case and control, based on the presence or absence of signs and symptoms of OME. After history taking and clinical examination including otoscopy, diagnosis of OME was confirmed as well as tympanometry for confirmation of OME. The patients in the case group had OME but the patients in the control group did not.

Exclusion criteria included patients who did not consent to enter the study, a history of previous adenoidectomy, neurological disorders, genetic syndromes, craniofacial abnormalities such as Down syndrome, and other causes of airway obstruction such as deviated septum, nasal polyps, and turbinate hypertrophy. In addition patients with active infection were excluded. We described objectives and methods of the study to parents of the patients and they were asked questions to ensure that they understood the procedure. Afterwards, they were allowed to ask their possible questions. Later, written permissions were obtained from all parents. Then all patients underwent surgical adenoidectomy under the same conditions, and adenoid samples were prepared with curette. A core biopsy specimen was taken from each adenoid tissue; collected samples were placed immediately in PSB buffer. In addition, for the case group, samples from the middle ear effusion were taken. For this purpose, outer ear canal was cleaned with 70% alcohol solution, then an incision was made at the anterior inferior quadrant of the eardrum. Samples were collected from middle ear fluid and were placed in the PSB transmission medium. The effusion and adenoid tissue samples were transported to microbiology laboratory. The samples were frozen immediately after removal and stored at −20°C; when required, specimens were thawed, and supernatants of centrifuged specimens were assayed. To measure the DNA of H. pylori, genomic isolation kit was used.

Measurement was performed by a spectrophotometer. Thus the existence of the DNA of H. pylori was determined in the bands of 260–280nm by absorption rate. At the end, all patients’ information was entered the checklist. Data was reported by descriptive statistics and analysis was done by chi-square and Fisher exact tests and SPSS software was applied.

The ethical code of this article is IR.KMU.REC.1395.344.

The number of patients who entered the study was 50 children who were studied in two groups of 25 cases and 25 controls. 24 patients (48%) were male and 26 (52%) were female. Out of 50 patients, 18 patients (70%), in the case group had H. pylori in the middle ear fluid, 3 patients (12%) in the control group had H. pylori in adenoid tissue and 1 patient (4%), in the case group had H. pylori in adenoid tissue. Thus the frequency of H. pylori in the middle ear fluid in the case group is more than it's frequency in adenoid tissues of both case and control groups (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Out of 26 girls, two patients (7.7%) (one patient in the case group and one patient in the control group), had H. pylori in adenoid tissue. Out of 24 boys, two (8.3%) in the control group had H. pylori in adenoid tissue and none of the boys in case group had bacteria in adenoid tissue. Eight girls (30.8%) in the case group had H. pylori in the middle ear fluid samples and 10 boys (41.7%) in the case group had H. pylori in the middle ear fluid. Results are reported in Table 2. So according to Table 2 we can say there is no significant gender difference in our comparison (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

The frequency of H. pylori in adenoids and middle ear effusions of case and control groups.

(0.04MB).

Figure 2.

H. pylori frequency based on gender in case and control groups.

(0.07MB).

OME is one of the most common causes of hearing loss among children in developed countries. OME is characterized by fluid accumulation in the middle ear with no active infection; if the disease persists for more than three months, it is called chronic OME. In several studies, the relationship between H. pylori and the pathogenesis of various upper aerodigestive tract problems have been shown. H. pylori for reproduction needs a microaerophilic environment. This environment is present in the middle ear of OME patients. The mechanism of the colonization of these bacteria in the gastric mucosa is still unclear. It is said this bacteria grows by implanting inside the mucosal epithelium of the stomach, protected by impermeable mucus layer to the gastric acid. The PH of the luminal side of the mucus layer is 1.0–2.0 and the PH of the mucosal side is approximately 7.4. The PH of the middle ear effusions is also between 7.0–9.0. In H. pylori infections mucosal metaplasia and goblet cell hyperplasia occurs, a similar situation in OME.7,13 In this study, we applied PCR for the detection of H. pylori by specimen collection from middle ear. We calculated H. pylori positivity rate not on the basis of the number of ears, but the number of patients because we would like to know the existence rate of H. pylori in each individual. We found H. pylori in 70% of the middle ear effusions is positive, and this is relatively high in comparison with other studies such as Chul Von et al.14 (the prevalence of H. pylori was 30%), so we suggest that H. pylori could be an important etiologic factor for development of OME. Agirdir et al.15 reported that H. pylori positivity was 66.6% in effusion of 30 patients with OME and the adenoid of the patient group and the control group showed no significant difference in the prevalence of H. pylori. Yilmase et al.10 reported that the PCR of middle ear effusion was positive for H. pylori in 45% of the patients with OME. In another study by Yilmaz et al.16 eighteen subjects with OME and adenoid hyperplasia and 20 subjects with only adenoid hyperplasia were compared. The results showed that in the study group, H. pylori was positive in 67% of children. None of the tissue samples obtained from adenoids of study group and only one of the tissue samples in the control group was positive with PCR. There are two possible explanations for why H. pylori has been discovered in the effusion of the middle ear. The first is that the tonsil and adenoid act as a reservoir for H. pylori. Since the tonsil, adenoid, and Eustachian tube are anatomically close, this can allow for H. pylori to spread directly.17,18 The second possibility is due to gastroesophageal reflux, since the gastric fluid can affect the middle ear through the Eustachian tube, and H. pylori that is mixed in with the gastric fluid can then be detected in the middle ear. There is an association between chronic middle ear problems and gastroesophageal reflux. Higher concentration of pepsin/pepsinogen in the middle ear than serum of patients with OME has been reported by Tasker et al.7

In a study that published in 2008 by Fancy et al.3 they reported, in comparison of 45 patients with adenoid hyperplasia and OME with 35 patients who just had adenoid hyperplasia, there was no significant difference in the incidence of this infection between the two groups.

In another study by Saki et al.19 the prevalence of H. pylori in patients with OME was studied. Eighty-four patients who were subjected to adenoidectomy and myringotomy were included in the study group. Ninety-one patients who had only adenoidectomy were selected as the control group. Adenoid samples were positive for H. pylori in 25% patients in the study group and 19.8% patients in the control group. In the study group, 42.8% effusion samples (Otitis Media) of the patients were positive for H. pylori. They showed that the colonization of H. pylori in adenoid tissue and in the middle ear may be involved in the pathogenesis of OME.

In the present study, we found that the presence of H. pylori in adenoid samples of study group was 4% and in control group was 12%; this finding is not significant in comparison of H. pylori positivity of patients with OME that was 70% indicating that adenoid tissue is not a reservoir for H. pylori. We hope future studies will be done on the relationship between OME and H. pylori in the world population.

Our study showed that there is significant H. pylori presence in middle ear of the children with chronic OME, indicating H. pylori have a possible role in OME pathogenesis. In addition we detected H. pylori presence in 4 of 50 adenoid specimens, supporting the idea that adenoid tissue does not act as a reservoir for H. pylori.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.