Journal Information
Vol. 80. Issue 5.
Pages 386-389 (September - October 2014)
Visits
8876
Vol. 80. Issue 5.
Pages 386-389 (September - October 2014)
Original article
Open Access
Objective comparison between perforation and hearing loss
Visits
8876
Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha Ribeiroa,
Corresponding author
quintanilha.f@uol.com.br

Corresponding author.
, Verônica Reche Rodrigues Gaudinob, Caio Dinelli Pinheirob, Gil Junqueira Marçalb, Edson Ibrahim Mitreb
a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (5)
Show moreShow less
Tables (1)
Table 1. Pearson's correlation coefficient found for each frequency analyzed.
Abstract
Introduction

There appears to be no relationship between the size of tympanic perforations and hearing loss. Some studies in the literature have assessed this connection, with conflicting data and without proper methodology, especially concerning the measurement of the size of the perforation, which was performed in a subjective manner.

Objective

To evaluate the size of tympanic perforations and to relate them to hearing loss in four different sound frequencies through the use of an objective method.

Methods

Transversal retrospective study. The present study evaluated 187 perforations through digital imaging, calculated the percentages of the tympanic membrane that was perforated using ImageScope software version 11.1.2.760 and correlated perforations’ size with hearing loss at four frequencies.

Results

Data were statistically analyzed using Pearson's correlation test.

Conclusion

There was no significant relationship between the size of tympanic perforations and hearing loss in the four analyzed frequencies.

Keywords:
Evaluation
Tympanic membrane perforation
Hearing loss
Resumo
Introdução

Parece não haver relação entre o tamanho das perfurações timpânicas e a perda auditiva. Alguns trabalhos na literatura estudaram esta relação, com dados conflitantes e sem uso adequado da metodologia empregada, principalmente quanto à medição do tamanho da perfuração que se faz de modo subjetivo.

Objetivo

Analisar através de um método objetivo o tamanho dessas perfurações e relacioná-las com perdas auditivas em quatro frequências sonoras.

Método

Estudo retrospectivo de corte transversal. Foram avaliadas 187 perfurações timpânicas através de digitalização de imagem, medidas porcentualmente com o uso do software ImageScope Version 11.1.2.760 e correlacionadas com os limiares auditivos em quatro frequências.

Resultados

Os dados foram avaliados estatisticamente pelo teste de correlação de Pearson, que não demonstrou correlação entre o tamanho da perfuração timpânica e o grau de perda auditiva.

Conclusão

Não há relação significativa entre o tamanho das perfurações timpânicas e as quatro frequências estudadas.

Palavras-chave:
Avaliação
Perfuração da membrana timpânica
Perda auditiva
Full Text
Introduction

This was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study. It is clear that there appears to be no direct relationship between the size of the tympanic membrane in simple chronic otitis media and hearing loss assessed by pure tone audiometry. This suspicion has been studied and evaluated, but by using subjective methods to measure the size of the perforations.1–5 With the advent of modern computer programs, the percentage of these perforations in relation to the total area of the membrane can be objectively evaluated. These more accurate data can be used to compare more reliably this finding with each audiometry frequency. Few similar studies were retrieved in the literature.6,7 This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the percentual size of the perforation and hearing loss in four frequencies.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort trial conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of a medical teaching institution, approved by the Research Ethics Committee under N° 9228. Images of the tympanic membrane were acquired using a 3mm diameter rigid fiber optic telescope coupled to a digital camera and with computer digital capture.

Only pictures of simple chronic otitis media (dry perforations as sequelae of necrotizing otitis) were selected, with more than six months without otorrhea reported by the patients. Hearing loss in four frequencies (500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz, and 4kHz), with any degree of conductive hearing loss, was considered. The audiometries were performed by phonoaudiologists, using the Katz technique.8

ImageScope, version 11.1.2.760 by Aperio Technologies®, was used. The selected images were evaluated by circumscribing (by tracking with a mouse) the total area of the tympanic membrane, which was then measured by pixel counting (Fig. 1). The same procedure was applied to the area of the perforation. Both measures were transported to an Excel® (Microsoft) spreadsheet. Since the determination of the area of perforation was then calculated as a percentage of the area of the tympanic membrane, there was no distortion because of the angle of view or the proximity of the image capture. These measurements were performed by two examiners, at different times, and only those that coincided with an error factor of <5% were considered.

Figure 1.

Image obtained through circumscription of the tympanic membrane and of its perforation.

(0.09MB).

The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study were as follows:

  • -

    Inclusion – images of tympanic membrane with perforation without evidence of inflammation or otorrhea for more than six months duration, simple chronic otitis media.

  • -

    Exclusion – evaluation of the perforation size by two examiners presenting a difference >5%.

The audiograms were evaluated only with respect to their conductive hearing loss, i.e. the air-bone gap that characterized the tympanic involvement (membrane or ossicular chain). The following frequencies were used: 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz and 4000Hz.

Data obtained from the perforations of the tympanic membranes were correlated with the air-bone gap in each of the frequencies analyzed by Pearson's correlation test.

Results

The study included 187 ears that presented simple chronic otitis media. The age of patients analyzed ranged from 4 to 75 years. The right ear was involved in 79 patients, while 108 exhibited the problem in left ear. The correlation between the size of the perforation and the frequencies is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Pearson's correlation coefficient found for each frequency analyzed.

  500Hz  1000Hz  2000Hz  4000Hz 
Pearson's correlation coefficient  0.415  0.372  0.282  0.325 

The correlation between the percentage of perforation of the tympanic membrane and the air-bone gap that exists in each of the evaluated frequencies is shown in Figs. 2–5.

Figure 2.

Correlation between percentage of tympanic membrane perforation and air-bone gap observed at a 500Hz frequency.

(0.11MB).
Figure 3.

Correlation between the percentage of tympanic membrane perforation and air-bone gap observed at a 1000Hz frequency.

(0.1MB).
Figure 4.

Correlation between the percentage of tympanic membrane perforation and air-bone gap observed at a 2000Hz frequency.

(0.1MB).
Figure 5.

Correlation between percentage of tympanic membrane perforation and air-bone gap observed at a 4000Hz frequency.

(0.1MB).

Fig. 2 illustrates the correlation between the percentage of perforation of the tympanic membrane and the air-bone gap observed at a frequency of 500Hz.

Fig. 3 shows the correlation between the percentage of perforation of the tympanic membrane and the air-bone gap observed at a frequency of 1000Hz.

In Fig. 4, a correlation between the percentage of perforation of the tympanic membrane and the air-bone gap observed in the frequency of 2000Hz is shown.

Finally, in Fig. 5, the correlation between the percentage of perforation of the tympanic membrane and the air-bone gap observed at a frequency of 4000Hz is shown.

Discussion

The linear correlation between the size of the tympanic perforation in patients with simple chronic otitis media and hearing loss in four different frequencies was investigated. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the frequencies of 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz and 4000Hz was, respectively, 0.415, 0.372, 0.282 and 0.325, demonstrating that there is a strong linear correlation between the variables studied.

The correlation for the frequency of 500Hz was found to be moderately significant for the issue examined, while the correlations observed for the other frequencies proved to be of little significance.

In the literature, Pannu et al.9 reported different results, demonstrating an increase in hearing loss with increasing sizes of the tympanic perforation in 100 patients who also had perforations without signs of active inflammation or secretion. Importantly, in that study, the perforation size was estimated by measuring their greater vertical (R1) and greater horizontal (R2) diameters with a 1-mm wire, inserting the values into the formula: perforation area=π×R1×R2.

Ibekwe et al.,10 analyzed 67 patients with a total of 77 perforations. Using the Pearson correlation: p=0.01, r=0.05, they concluded that the larger the tympanic membrane perforation, the greater the loss in sound perception.

The article by Ahmad and Ramani1 is in agreement with the studies previously mentioned. In that study, 70 patients with dry central perforation were analyzed. The patients were divided into four groups according to the size, expressed as a percentage, of the observed perforation. These authors analyzed the hearing loss in each frequency in each of their groups, and concluded that the hearing loss increased with the size of perforation.

Therefore, the present study, with a larger number of patients and using a more modern methodology, contradicts the literature and leads to the conclusion that factors, other than the size of perforation (e.g., disjunctions or fixations of the ossicular chain), compromise the auditory acuity in patients with simple chronic otitis media.

Conclusion

There was no correlation between the size of tympanic membrane perforations in simple chronic otitis media and hearing loss at 500Hz; 1000Hz; 2000Hz and 4000Hz.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
S.W. Ahmad, G.V. Ramani.
Hearing loss in perforations of tympanic membrane.
J Laryngol Otol, 93 (1979), pp. 1091-1098
[2]
S.E. Voss, J.J. Rosowski, S.N. Merchant, W.T. Peake.
Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. II. A simple model.
J Acoust Soc Am, 110 (2001), pp. 1445-1452
[3]
S.E. Voss, J.J. Rosowski, S.N. Merchant, W.T. Peake.
Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.
J Acoust Soc Am, 110 (2001), pp. 1432-1444
[4]
S.E. Voss, J.J. Rosowski, S.N. Merchant, W.T. Peake.
How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?.
Acta Otolaryngol, 121 (2001), pp. 169-173
[5]
C.Y. Hsu, J.H. Chen, J.H. Hwang, T.C. Liu.
A computer program to calculate the size of tympanic membrane perforation.
Clin Otolaryngol, 29 (2004), pp. 340-342
[6]
I. Saliba, A. Abela, P. Arand.
Tympanic membrane perforation: size, site and hearing evaluation.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 75 (2011), pp. 527-531
[7]
R.P. Mehta, J.J. Rosowski, S.E. Voss, E.O. Neil, S.N. Merchant.
Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane.
Otol Neurotol, 27 (2006), pp. 136-143
[8]
R.S. Schlauch, P. Nelsen.
Puretone evaluation.
Handbook of clinical audiology (chapter 30){set as comment}, 6th ed., pp. 30-49
[9]
K.K. Pannu, S. Chadha, D. Kumar, D. Preeti.
Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 63 (2011), pp. 208-213
[10]
T.S. Ibekwe, O.G. Nwaorgu, T.G. Ijaduola.
Correlating the site of tympanic membrane perforation with Hearing loss.
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord, 9 (2009), pp. 1

Please cite this article as: Ribeiro FA, Gaudino VR, Pinheiro CD, Marçal GJ, Mitre EI. Objective comparison between perforation and hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:386–9.

Institution: Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Copyright © 2014. Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition)
Article options
Tools
en pt
Announcement Nota importante
Articles submitted as of May 1, 2022, which are accepted for publication will be subject to a fee (Article Publishing Charge, APC) payment by the author or research funder to cover the costs associated with publication. By submitting the manuscript to this journal, the authors agree to these terms. All manuscripts must be submitted in English.. Os artigos submetidos a partir de 1º de maio de 2022, que forem aceitos para publicação estarão sujeitos a uma taxa (Article Publishing Charge, APC) a ser paga pelo autor para cobrir os custos associados à publicação. Ao submeterem o manuscrito a esta revista, os autores concordam com esses termos. Todos os manuscritos devem ser submetidos em inglês.